HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedAdvertisingAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

Montecristo Montecristo No. 4

View all Mareva Cigars    

<< Montecristo No. 3Montecristo No. 4 Reserva >>

Montecristo Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Gauge:MediumLength:129
Format:MarevaRing:42
Weight:8,46 gr.Score:7.4
Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25


Average user rating


Review #164: I like this cigar because of the fact that is so mild. It doesn't have a complex taste as a cohiba and thats for is good for begginers. A cigar for all the times of a day. - Submitted by pmavros on February 19, 2008


Review #163: Yesterday I smoked my second Monte no.4, from a pack of 5. Now, I haven't written a review for my first one because seriously, it sucked. It was very windy when I smoked it and I had to relight it several times, which I think destroyed it's taste. This time I took my precautions and I smoked it in a closed space. The pre lit aroma, of course, is wonderful. I quickly cut off the cap and test the draw; good. I start lighting. The first puff was very good. Can't describe the taste exactly, but lots of thick blue smoke came from my mouth, from the burning end of the stick and from the drawing end as well. The cigar started to calm down and the smoke decreased a little bit but stayed tasty with notes of cedar from one puff to another. My palate is not yet well developed, I can't distinguish different tastes, but I could easily pick out what seemed to me like honey. I don't know, but when smoking the RyJ No.2 I could distinguish more nuts and cocoa tastes, I could find these nowhere here. There was also this stinging taste on your tongue (which I love) but which didn't last long. The bitter taste that we sometimes face was still there sometimes, but certainly better than the first no.4, and the burn was nearly perfect, just had to correct it twice. This was a 30 or 40 minutes smoke in all, didn't last long, unfortunately, but certainly was better than the first one. But I still can't understand the hype about these no.4's, I still like the RyJ No.2 better, to be honest with you. Worth saying also, is that my first no.4 caused me a severely annoying buzz, this time no buzz at all. I will leave the remaining three, won't touch them until spring. But I was deciding between a 3 pack Monte Edmundo or a 3 pack RyJ Short Churchills for my next purchase, but I think I will settle down for the RyJ. - Submitted by Lucky Break on January 30, 2008


Review #162: I've smoked about 4 of these now, and they were all different. The first one i bought for a test drive, and it was wonderful with a mild beginning and continuously new flavours went in to my mouth with rich thick smoke. I was impressed and bought three more. 2 of these were not as good. It was the same taste all the way, and one of them had a very simple kind of boring taste. I must admit that i stored one of these in open air for admiration a day, which might have ruined it(?) - therefore I don't count this in my score. Luckily the last monte#4 saved me, and was just as good as the first one with very rich complexity in taste starting mild, and almost changing in taste with every third draw - excellent. - Submitted by markbk on January 28, 2008


Review #161: I find the monte #4's (and #3's too), sometimes impossible to draw. So much so that I don't buy them anymore. They do improve after 5 years in the humidor, which is one helluva wait ! The small montes, and the monte #2's are much better, I also have some very big montes (22cm) which are awesome. If you like the #3/4 size then I recommend cobibas, R&J's or Trinidads, a very reasonably priced quality cuban everyday cigar. - Submitted by mwlacey on January 20, 2008


Review #160: I smoked one out of a 5 pack. It started with strong honey but then the weather was very windy and I had to light and relight it several times, which, I think, spoiled it's taste. I still have 4 of these lying down, it has been nearly a month since then and I will be trying another one soon, in a closed area this time to avoid the wind. This review is not conclusive. I will be updating it soon. - Submitted by Lucky Break on January 19, 2008


This cigar spans 54 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54



 
» Add a new review for Montecristo Montecristo No. 4

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

  

Montecristo Montecristo No. 4


 RSS Latest Reviews