HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedAdvertisingAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

View all Piramide Cigars    

<< Montecristo No. 1Montecristo No. 2 Gran Reserva 2005 >>

Montecristo Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Gauge:ThickLength:156
Format:PiramideRing:52
Weight:14,26 gr.Score:8.3
Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25


Average user rating


Review #83: Factory Code: LOB Date: AUgust \'04 As I monte lover, I was looking forward to my first box of No. 2. I was a little dissapointed when I opened the box. The wrappers were not nearly as oily as all the other Monte\'s I had smoked. The wrap is also pretty loose but they draw and burn well enough. They are not as strong as the Edmundo and have less of the monte flavour. Don\'t know why this is. I was expecting a lot more. I mean they are good and the size is great but they are not as flavouful as i had expected. They are on the young side, but I don\'t see how ageing is going to help. I\'ve smoked several from this box, I ditched one which was very bitter, a couple have been very good indeed and at one point I thought this is THE cigar for me, but overall, they cannot touch the EDmundo for flavour and consistency. - Submitted by peter bond on March 30, 2005


Review #82: TO REVIEWER NO 79 DEREK C. Yes i guess you are right about this comment, however the cubans should be using tobaccos of a better age in their flagship brand, what if a novice smoker who is starting out in cubans and doesnt have knowledge regarding aging, and buys these on a recommendation, he will be chased away from this classic. I have some no 2's with several years of aging on them, my father has several boxes from 1985 and 1986 and they are truly devine as an aged classic, a classic that the Monty no 2 truly deserves to be. - Submitted by bigyesta on March 11, 2005


Review #81: Just bought a box of these two days ago and had the chance to smoke the first one from the box and was very pleased. It had a very wonderful and somewhat strong flavor but overall it was excellent when mated with a glass of whisky. The only problem I experienced was after 60% of the stick had been smoked it refused to stay lit. The last monte2 I had from a different box stayed lit for roughly 85% of the stick. Not sure what's up with that but regardless I am glad I bought a box of 25. - Submitted by Einbier.NET on March 11, 2005


Review #80: 1996 my first cuban cigar ever. Oh boy was I in for a treat!! This cigar is arguebly the best Cuba has to offer in pyramide size. Tried the Vegas Robanias Unicos Very close call between these two. In the End I always find myself going back to the Monte # 2. Highly recommended fine clean perfect smoke. - Submitted by EZ on March 10, 2005


Review #79: To review#78, I really don't understand why need to compare a sick period cigar with other 3 to 4 years old cigars. Sometimes if you are lucky, u even can have mont#2 got aging inside the dress box, but it needs time. Sure not a box of them from Dec04! - Submitted by Derek.C. on March 10, 2005


This cigar spans 68 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68



 
» Add a new review for Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

  

Montecristo Montecristo No. 2


 RSS Latest Reviews