By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

Romeo y Julieta Churchills

View all Julieta No. 2 Cigars

<< Celestiales Finos

Clarines >>

Origin:

Cuba

Manufactured: Hand Made

Gauge:

Thick

Length:

178

Format:

Julieta No. 2

Ring:

Weight:

15,07 gr.

Score:

8.0

Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25

Average user rating

Review #57:

It\'s one of Cubas classics, but like many it does suffer from consistency problems. I have smoked a couple of these from 1994 (tubed) and they were the single most delicious and wonderful cigars I have ever smoked so far, dark oily wrappers, fairly loose roll especially due to the age and rich medium flavour, very complex and mature. I have smoked some very flat and flavourless ones from \'01 and a couple of beauties from \'03 which were not spot on but from the taste and construction and great wrappers I could tell they had huge potential for aging. I recomend you get advice on vintages from a good merchant, or just pay a little more for some with at least 10 years on them, you won\'t be dissapointed. 8/10 normally, excluding the odd poor vintage, but great vintages a deffinite 10...therefore a 9 average. :) - Submitted by A. Dyer on August 14, 2005

Review #56:

Had a 2000 box of these. Barely smokable - I have had to dump nearly half of them due to terrible construction (a previous reviewer mentioned quality issues from cigars made around this time). It\'s a shame because I can believe they were once a great cigar. I\'ll just have to stick with the barely affordable Cohiba Esplendido for this size cigar. Are the later rolled ones any better? - Submitted by poshjonny on August 13, 2005

Review #55:

Smoked a couples from a 2001 box and others from a recent one to get a clear idea, harsh to delicate smoke in both cases, bitter to subtle aromas, try your luck if you wish, I think the production is too unbalanced. Mildly recommended. - Submitted by dee_m on August 1, 2005

Review #54:

Bought this Churchill tubos in a box of ten. Normaly a very nice smoke but the one I tried yesterday was disappointing. Nice mild, kind of fruity flavors in the beginning witch became a bid more intensive after the first inch. About 4 inches later I had to relight for two times and than finally gave up’ just smoked a bit more than half of the cigar. Also the smoke became very harsh and extremely bitter. Out of this box it was already the second turning out like this. - Submitted by Helgoland on June 26, 2005

Review #53:

Never make a comment, from a single stick. I smoke 2-3 boxes of this; 3-4 stick was inferior quality, but rest of all have superior, one of the best 3 churchills (others,sir winston and saint luis rey) - Submitted by igor on April 19, 2005

This cigar spans 36 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

» Add a new review for Romeo y Julieta Churchills

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

Romeo y Julieta Churchills

RSS Latest Reviews