By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

H. Upmann Monarcas

View all Julieta No. 2 Cigars

<< Medias Coronas MM

Monarchs >>

Origin:

Cuba

Manufactured: Hand Made

Gauge:

Thick

Length:

178

Format:

Julieta No. 2

Ring:

Weight:

15,07 gr.

Score:

8.9

Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25

H. Upmann Monarcas Review:

Same taste as H. Upmann Sir Winston. This is a cigar of exceptional quality. As it is from H. Upmann, the tobacco taste is strong and the materials used are first class. That strong tobacco taste is greatly balanced with herbal flavours. As time passes by, this cigar gets better and better.

Average user rating

Review #33:

SEP 01 the best churchill is not the monarcas or even the sir winston. it is not a complex cigar, too little taste. it is not bad, but this is not what i expect in a cuban.no offense - Submitted by Yilmaz on May 14, 2009

Review #32: Tried one, was utterly and completely plugged. Tried massaging it, but the wrapper immediately cracked and suddenly, the wrapper completely came off, leaving the filler of the cigar in my hand! Never seen that happen before. I could only smoke half of the first third. Shame, because the taste seemed to be really good.... - Submitted by Kangaroo495 on May 12, 2009

Review #31: I' got a 00 box of these, but there is a question. The ring label on the cigar is colorful one, like the one M50, different to the brown ring label for old H. Upmann in my memory. Is there something wrong of this box? who can tell me, thx - Submitted by jeddit on May 8, 2009

Review #30:

--- 01 Smoked a 2001 today - I forget the month. It was good but not great in both costruction and flavor. A little tightly rolled, but I still got a decent amount of smoke out of it. The flavor was typical Upmann complex spice and sweetness. It was a very rich, full bodied smoke at this age. Just not a flavor profile that I particularly care for. Giving it an 8+. Without the tight draw, probably would be a 9. - Submitted by Goldenberg on April 20, 2009

Review #29:

JAN 00 TO ALL WHO SEARCH FOR THE PERFECT MONARCA, IF YOU CAN FIND ANY FROM EARLY 2000 PRODUCTION BUY THEM ALL, I DID A YEAR OR TWP AGO I STARTED SEARCHING FOR THE OLDEST DATED BOXES AROUND, I FOUND THEM IN SWITZERLAND THEY HAD BOXES FROM SLA JAN 01 AND THEY HAD A LOT OF BOXES, I PURCHASED ONE AT FIRST THE CIGARS HAD THE TRADEMARK MAIN TASTE OF THE WET MUSTY TASTE AND SMELL, THESE ARE THE MONARCAS AT THEIR FINEST, TODATE I HAVE ONLY SMOKED 5 FROM EACH BOX OF 25, I HAVE A TOTAL OF 50 BOXES ALL FROM SLA, JAN, 01, I JUST FINISHED ANOTHER ONE AND MUSTY RIGHT DOWN TO THE NUB SO TO EVERY ONE LOOKING FOR THESE GEMS GOOD HUNTING TO ALL. BIG YESTA - Submitted by BIGYESTA on August 23, 2008

This cigar spans 7 pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7

» Add a new review for H. Upmann Monarcas

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

H. Upmann Monarcas

RSS Latest Reviews