HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedAdvertisingAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

Montecristo Montecristo Tubos

View all Corona Grande Cigars    

<< Montecristo No. 7Petit Edmundo >>

Montecristo Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Gauge:MediumLength:155
Format:Corona GrandeRing:42
Weight:10,14 gr.Score:8.1
Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25


Average user rating


Review #45: ---   sigaro superbo, piccolo prezzo, considerato il formato. buono il tiraggio e discreta paletta aromatica, con sfumature di cuoio e terra - Submitted by goethe66 on November 23, 2010


Review #44: ---   Excellent taste. I don't know how old it was as it was given to me as a gift. I would purchase them if given the opportunity. - Submitted by Daniel Walz on July 3, 2010


Review #43: ---   I'm in complete accord with review #41 in almost every possible way, excepting that mine had a very sloppy burn that canoed this way and that, and was likely due to its youth. If frozengun420's review is any indication, it would appear that it's the only thing that age will improve in this cigar. I acquired mine from a reliable local cigar shop in Montreal that tends to purvey their cigars with at least two years past the box date, and having mine for nearly six months in the humidor; three years is the most charitable estimation for its post-production age. However, realistically; it could easily have been half that age. The typical woody, grassy Montrecristo flavor was there in a light to medium body, but it was so faint I barely knew I was smoking a cigar, especially in the opening of the first third. It basically stayed this way until somewhere in between the last half and third of the stick. But in spite of this blandness and lightness in body and profile; my palate quickly began to be clouded by an unsavory aftertaste that developed as early as the end of the first third, which significantly interfered with my ability to pickout any underlying subtleties and nuances, let alone enjoy it. When finally things seemed to be going somewhere, it gradually picked up in power and strength, but lacked what I would call refined development, and proceeded to do only just that until finally it developed that harshness that tells you the jig is up. I feel like giving this stick an absolute zero, especially since it robbed me of nearly an hour and a half I would rather have spent watching paint dry. I've had far more satisfying smokes that had almost as little development and took less than half that time; the Cohiba Siglo I (also purchased at the same time and place, and thus subject to the same conditions) comes to mind. I know it isn't fair to judge a cigar based on one experience; but at this price I can't imagine desiring a box, let alone a second round with it. Since it was my one and only experience with this cigar, in all likelihood there's room for improvement, and it could've been worse. The nicest thing I can say about this cigar is that it was certainly better than a JLP or QyHno., but I struggle to think of another, more reputable brand that was worse. Maybe I'm being too harsh, but I'm making a sincere effort to honestly and fairly evaluate this cigar. And in all honesty and fairness the Montecristo line doesn't appeal to my tastes. But all things considered; I'm giving it one-and-a-half stars (3/10), and I shan't say I shall ever try it again, perhaps even if offered in gratuity. - Submitted by Karlos Marxos on May 23, 2010


Review #42: Wow, this is a cigar that encourages me to keep spending a little more than usual on cigars. Really satisfied. It's a little longer than most cigars so perfect for a little discussion with friends on a patio or to stretch the pleasure. Perfectly rolled, good draw and tasteful earthy flavor. I Loved it. Enjoy too - Submitted by dios humo on July 17, 2009


Review #41: This cigar had been aging in my humidor for 5 years(out of the tube). I was looking forward to smoking it, but was disappointed when I did. Don't get me wrong this cigar was well built, the burn was excellent and the draw was a bit firm but created a nice thick smoke. The disappointment was with the flavor...or lack there of. The first half was light and BORING. The second half(what I smoked of it) was stronger but also lacking any real flavor. Probably over aged for this stick. - Submitted by frozengun420 on June 10, 2009


This cigar spans 11 pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11



 
» Add a new review for Montecristo Montecristo Tubos

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

  

Montecristo Montecristo Tubos


 RSS Latest Reviews