HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedAdvertisingAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

View all Piramide Cigars    

<< Montecristo No. 1Montecristo No. 2 Gran Reserva 2005 >>

Montecristo Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Weight:14,26 gr.Score:8.3
Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25

Average user rating

Review #40: Bought an '04 box - couldn't wait: had one after only a month in my humidor. Was dissappointed with the result. Slightly tough draw, cigar burned quite hot (nicotine sting!) and lacked in flavour. Construction was excellent, with a gorgeous silky wrapper. I'll try the next one only after another six months I think! - Submitted by Barry McWilliams on September 6, 2004

Review #39: Bought a box July '04 from Canada via internet with a date stamp of June '03. I have had five or ten #2's in past but after 4 cigars into this box I am disappointed so far. They have a "young" almost "green" taste with each puff, although the aroma is very pleasing and complex. Obviously I need to age them and/or I have purchased a bad box. I've never been disappointed in this cigar thus far. Any suggestions are appreciated - Submitted by Brian on August 29, 2004

Review #38: Smoked my 1st #2 in 1999 in Negril, Jamaica and to this day it is the best cigar I have ever had. However, I bought a box dated Feb 03 last year and was disappointed by the inconsistency. Most of them tended to become very harsh halfway down. I reluctantly purchased another box dated Nov 03 and I have to agree with CoolBurn. I have smoked nearly 20 of these and they have all been excellent. Check the date on the box. Late 2003 or newer. Otherwise, don't buy them. - Submitted by Palmetto mike on August 27, 2004

Review #37: Recent production Monte #2's have been outstanding. Some of the best #2's I've had in years. As with most Habanos it would benefit greatly from age. However,after as little as one year these are smoking beautifully. These have been plagued with inconsistency over the years,but that seems to have been addressed in a big way. One of the greats. - Submitted by CoolBurn on August 17, 2004

Review #36: I quite like Montecristos, but I find them a bit boring; Lacking something. The #2 is the odd one out. Yes it is a typical montecristo, but it has something else. I've heard rumours that it contains an added variety of leaf or ferment. - Submitted by peanutaxis on August 10, 2004

This cigar spans 72 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72

» Add a new review for Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)


Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

 RSS Latest Reviews