HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedAdvertisingAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

View all Piramide Cigars    

<< Montecristo No. 1Montecristo No. 2 Gran Reserva 2005 >>

Montecristo Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Weight:14,26 gr.Score:8.3
Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25

Average user rating

Review #240: Got hooked over a year ago. Started to get sick of them, as I was having buring troubles. Forgot about them for a while until I went to Cuba. Got to Jose Marti airport, and Monte no. 2 was the only kind of cigar I could find there (aside from Guantanamero). Bought a box of three, went to my casa, and immediately to the Inglaterre for a Cubatta. Lit up the Monte 2. Don't know if it was kept in the most idela conditions, or if I was simply in the mood, but this was the best cigar I ever had. Burned incredibly well. Taste was so smooth, so rich. Smoked some other Monte 2's for the rest of my stay, they were (of course) excellent, but not like that first one... Brought a box back, haven't stopped smoking them since. - Submitted by Kangaroo495 on February 16, 2009

Review #239: i think the main reason why this cigar only can score8.3+ is bcos some guys being scammed with fake cigars n give bad ratings for this masterpiece. this cigar should have score 9 easily - Submitted by akaiserf on January 27, 2009

Review #238: my cigar for 2008,i have mostly smoked late 2007 ones,not had a single bad draw or poor one in 20 or so smoked. barnyard smells and beautifull monte flavours.still the king. - Submitted by paul watson on December 31, 2008

Review #237: --- 03 From down low in my cabinet I found this treasure. At least 5 y old. Dark, almost maduro wrapper, impeccable and beautiful. Roosted the foot to a perfect start. First draw was light with almost floral taste, Ah, I thought, this is going to be memorable. First third gave a hint of cocoa and there was even leather hiding. The lingering smoke smelled like heaven. After every puff it developed more spiced aromas. Just what I was hoping for, This WILL be a memorable occasion. Sipped on an old Caribbean rum and some well roosted coffee. Second third. No strength yet, more luxurious thick smoke but it started to burn uneven. This went on all of the second third. My lighter gave up after numerous attempts to correct the burn. No "torpedo shaped" glow. It burned like a sidekick. At the end of the second third the difference of the burn was halt an inch. Sipped some more rum and let it just go on. Taste developed more. More cacao and earthy leather. But it was not perfect. I believe it was due to the sideburn this cigar wasn’t perfect. Last third. Sideburn corrected itself more and more. Just as the taste. Now I could sense some typical Monte flavors. Building up some nice coffee/cocoa taste. But no strength. Before I let my stick go I had the feeling that this what not a strong cigar at all, more medium but with a thick "dark" smoke, steelgrey ashes with almost no flaws. I almost enjoyed it all. As I examined the ashes, burn, I do believe that all the veins of the leafs was gathered at one side of this cigar. This is not what I expect from a premium cigar. Very sad. I hope this is not significant for the rest of my Montes. If so IŽll ban them, give them away although the taste was very nice. I believe a good smoke is all about the cigar, construction, smoke, burn and taste. Here I had a serious burn issue that dragged the score down. I do hope Habanero official read this to improve my now lost favorite cigar. It was so beautiful at the start. (My Boli Belis have perfect burn) - Submitted by poppe on December 28, 2008

Review #236: NOV 07 Got a nov/07 box six months ago- tried one when i got it and it was a major disappointment. Tried one last nigh and it was awesome. Age did it well. Woody and spice, perfect draw- and real pleasure. - Submitted by neuticles on December 19, 2008

This cigar spans 72 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72

» Add a new review for Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)


Montecristo Montecristo No. 2

 RSS Latest Reviews