HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedAdvertisingAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

H. Upmann Lonsdales

View all Cervantes Cigars    

<< KingsMagnum 46 >>

H. Upmann Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Gauge:MediumLength:165
Format:CervantesRing:42
Weight:10,8 gr.Score:7.4
Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25


Average user rating


Review #6: Just tried one last night. Not impressed at all. The draw was bad, i had to lite the cigar about a dozen time but the taste was good, medium body. I always buy my cigars from LA CASA DEL HABANO in MONTREAL, the manager over there is called Mark, you go around with the men, talk about cigars, years, cabinet etc... When the time comes to choose the cigar, HE will pull-out the box and select the best one for you !!! As far is the LONSDALES is concern, i know i got the best one that was picked from a box 2000, 6 years old. The problem with the smaller ring cigars is, too much tobacco and very often too tight. Cohiba had the same problem with the Lanceros. I will probably try again later, Magnum 46 is still much better! - Submitted by beaver on June 6, 2006


Review #5: Loades with flavor, medium bodied cigar. I preferr the #2 for not as much volume of smoke with the lonsdale - Submitted by habanohal on January 13, 2006


Review #4: Very good cigar,full body strong taste. A little inconsitant, had to relight it 2 times,this one had a tight draught - Submitted by Toto on November 13, 2005


Review #3: Very satisfied about this cigar. Even burn, good taste, draw was also good. With a good taste I mean a very rich flavour and full bodied. Recommander. GRTZ - Submitted by Jort on June 10, 2005


Review #2: This is a very good full bodied cigar with a traditional firmer draw and few pretensions. I also found that it is quite strong in spite of a mild aroma. This lonsdale is a good choice for the gentlemen. The Montecristo #1 is more aromatic but not as full. - Submitted by tang on November 1, 2004


This cigar spans 2 pages: 1 [2]



 
» Add a new review for H. Upmann Lonsdales

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

  

H. Upmann Lonsdales


 RSS Latest Reviews