HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedAdvertisingAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

Hoyo de Monterrey Epicure No. 2

View all Robusto Cigars    

<< Epicure No. 1Exquisitos >>

Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Gauge:ThickLength:124
Format:RobustoRing:50
Weight:11,66 gr.Score:7.9
Presentation: Slide lid box of 25


Average user rating


Review #109: IF you can get your hands on 5 yr old cabs, you will not be dissapointed. % yrs is what I think is needed for these to shine. Been smokeing from 2 cabs from 2000 and they are tasty buggers. Light wrappers. Ihave 2 50 ct cabs from 05 and a few newer cabs that I noticed the newer they are the dareker the wrapper, almost maduro. Also the darker the wrapper the less flavor is what I have noticed. This is one that I have as an evry morning cigar - Submitted by habanohal on July 11, 2007


Review #108: I was disappointed with the first No.2 I smoked last week. I tried another one and it is definitely better, but these cigars are still in their sick period. They need more time to mature and recover. This was a good test, however. Lots of fruit, especially citrus, and herbs. I detected cinnamon. I really wasn't sure if my palate was off and so when I read the top review I was pleasantly surprised that my palate was bang on. These flavours aren't generally what I look for in a cigar. This is unlike any other Cuban robusto, in my opinion. There was no spice whatsoever. I like my robustos to make more of an expression. Perhaps these will in a few more years once they settle down. - Submitted by cookj1 on July 10, 2007


Review #107: Had one of these for the first time 2 days ago and must say very nice cigar. lots of smoke and flavour.overall medium strength and very nice cigar cant wait to light the 2 remaining ones jay - Submitted by jays on July 8, 2007


Review #106: I spent most of this cigar trying to figure out the flavours. I've never had a cigar like this, and it really isn't for my palate. I definitely noticed fruit (lots of citrus) and cinnamon. I couldn't figure out how a cigar could have these flavours. Before I began this review I quickly read cigars-review.org's review and they have the same flavours. My palate is taking a sigh of relief now! The construction was excellent with this cigar. ...very nice draw. There were slight burn problems, but nothing major. I found the wrapper wasn't burning as fast as the filler. Unusual because I generally find the wrapper burns faster than the filler if there are burn issues. I had to set this cigar down for two minutes. When I resumed smoking it, the flavours were very sour and acidic (not a pleasant cigar flavour). The HdM band is one of the nicest cigar bands. Unfortunately the appearance doesn't gain enough points from the flavour's downfalls to give it a great score, and ultimately this is a disappointing cigar. I expected much more, however, I wouldn't say these are great cuban puros flavours. - Submitted by cookj1 on July 4, 2007


Review #105: Lit up one of these yesterday on a warm summer evening, the first thing I give credit too is that ven while there was a swift breeze blowing outside this did little to affect the even burn, something I don't find too often. The first third of this cigar was pure cocoa, I could taste it from the first puffs, the second third for me was a mix of pepper and maybe some cinammon notes. The draw on this cigar was just a little bit too open, I feel a little more resistance would have been better. This was definitely one of the tastiest robustos i've ever had, yet in the end there is slight lacking of something that still makes the cohiba robusto come out on top. - Submitted by Gillette on June 27, 2007


This cigar spans 43 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43



 
» Add a new review for Hoyo de Monterrey Epicure No. 2

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

  

Hoyo de Monterrey Epicure No. 2


 RSS Latest Reviews