HomeHistory Of CigarsCigars GuideBy SizeTop RatedNewsLinksAbout Us

 By Brands:
Belinda Cigars
Bolivar Cigars
Cabanas Cigars
Cifuentes Cigars
Cohiba Cigars
Cuaba Cigars
Davidoff Cigars
Diplomaticos Cigars
Dunhill Cigars
El Rey del Mundo Cigars
Fonseca Cigars
Gispert Cigars
Guantanamera Cigars
H. Upmann Cigars
Hoyo de Monterrey Cigars
Jose L. Piedra Cigars
Juan Lopez Cigars
La Corona Cigars
La Escepcion Cigars
La Flor de Cano Cigars
La Flor del Caney Cigars
La Gloria Cubana Cigars
Los Statos de Luxe Cigars
Maria Guerrero Cigars
Montecristo Cigars
Partagas Cigars
Por Larranaga Cigars
Punch Cigars
Quai d'Orsay Cigars
Quintero y Hno. Cigars
Rafael Gonzalez M. Cigars
Ramon Allones Cigars
Romeo y Julieta Cigars
Saint Luis Rey Cigars
San Cristobal de La H. Cigars
Sancho Panza Cigars
Siboney Cigars
Trinidad Cigars
Troya Cigars
Vegas Robaina Cigars
Vegueros Cigars

H. Upmann Magnum 50

View all Double Robusto Cigars    

<< Magnum 46Magnum 50 LE 2005 >>

H. Upmann Cigars
Origin:CubaManufactured: Hand Made
Gauge:ThickLength:160
Format:Double RobustoRing:50
Weight:15 gr.Score:6.8
Presentation: Slide lid boxes comprising 10, 25 or 50 cigars.

H. Upmann Magnum 50 Review:

After the great success of the Magnum 50 Edicion Limitada 2005, H. Upmann has released this cigar, that will become the benchmark size of the brand.

Average user rating


Review #14: --- 08 A pretty strong cigar with almost no flavor at all. There´s nothing more to say. I rather smoke a cheap philipinian stick than this one. - Submitted by Maerth on December 6, 2008


Review #13: Hola. I have to agree with Franz-Eric (review 11): Some 2008 batches of this Magnum 50 are a completely disaster, poorly rolled, underfilled with a poor blend. Seems someone in Habanos wants to 'kill' the H Upmann prestige accepting a Worldwide distribution of bad cigars from the Magnum 50 series and Magnum 46 tubed series. I don't know why these cigars passed the well annonunced 'Quality Control Department'. I felt so bad in a Pasion Habanos Spanish presentation of Magnum 50 and almost all cigars were in bad conditions, imagine the face of the Habanos staff present at the event. We are not here to applause Habanos mistakes with free stars... - Submitted by olisiponense on December 3, 2008


Review #12: MAY 08 Tried my first one from a 50 cab. Well balanced and complex taste. I found it very strong and felt a bit dizzy afterwards - Submitted by styxer on December 1, 2008


Review #11: --- 08 Tried two of these sticks from a recent batch. I don't remember the month, but I did see "08" under the box. (Usually, I bring a pad & pen with me when shopping for singles). Got them from a trusted source, who carries only cubans acquired through official channels, i.e., almost straight from Habanos s.a. So we must presume that this batch was not a counterfeit. These wannabe cigars were way underfilled. As a result, the smoke was much too dense and irritating. The underfilled stogies that I had the displeasure of smoking in the past tended to produce little smoke, but not this one. Poor mouthfeel - just a buccal overkill. Of course, the draw was too loose, and the erratic burning kept me busy with the lighter. Got fed up half way thru on both occasion. In fact, the second stick showed signs of severe malfunctions soon after the last third, and started to unravel before the second half. Threw it out the window to end my misery. It is hard to appraise with any accuracy the quality of the blend, since the construction left so much to be desired. Nevertheless, and sadly, I did taste honest flavours that could have contributed to a decent experience with better quality control. The reviews on this site make me think older batches might be better than this one. Maybe the next ones will improve. I'll try again with another production year, in a few years... - Submitted by Franz-Eric on November 29, 2008


Review #10: APR 08 Cab of 10. Box Code ARO. A well made toro with some spice. Not overly complex. Burned well and drew effortlessly. Still too young to pass judgement. - Submitted by gabraham2785 on November 28, 2008


This cigar spans 3 pages: [1] 2 3



 
» Add a new review for H. Upmann Magnum 50

Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.

(Click here to Register or Login)

  

H. Upmann Magnum 50


 RSS Latest Reviews