 | | Origin: | Cuba | Manufactured: Hand Made |
| Gauge: | Medium | Length: | 102 |
| Format: | Perla | Ring: | 42 |
| Weight: | 5,91 gr. | Score: | 7.7 |
| Presentation: 2 Layers in a Box of 25 |
Average user rating     
Review #9:     Marvellous flawless construction, great character, easy draw, nice earthy flavour from the beginning. Morning coffee, this little stick, Compay Segundo on the air...what a nice day! - Submitted by sasha on May 1, 2007
Review #8:     Excellent Cuban in a small package. Have smoked Monty 5 for years, but this medium bodied cigar, although produced in the same factory, carries a lot more muscle. The two that I enjoyed last weekend were virgin from a box dated ABR 06. The draw was very good and burned evenly for the whole 40 to 45 minutes. Aroma of earth tones and pepper were prevalent. Aging will only enhance this fine cigar and will make Monty lovers shiver. - Submitted by Don Diego on September 7, 2006
Review #7:     Not the best perla size Havana around but it's still enjoyable and quite tasty. Interesting flavour which throughout seemed to borrow from different brand flavours such as Montecristo, Cohiba and Romeo y Julieta. It is like a coctail of medium bodied favourites, I have never tasted a cigar before that did this. I'd still prefer Trinidad Reyes, Montecristo No.5 or Romeo tres petit coronas over these, but they are very nice and you deffinately should try some. - Submitted by A. Dyer on December 5, 2004
Review #6:     Picked one up to compare to the Monte 5. This is how I saw it (done in "thirds" of the cigar) - 1/3: light sweetness with hints of very light spice
2/3: sweetness gone and replaced with very light spice. Not as smooth as the first third
3/3: same level of smoothness as second third with spices increasing to mild
Comments: gets a little too spicy at the final third but less so than the Monte 5. a nice short smoke
- Submitted by Deen on October 22, 2004
Review #5:     I smoked my first one from a 98' box. Very satisfying little cigar, it can be compared with a sweeter, less earthier Monte 5, not as strong, but perfectly rolled, no flaws at all. Quite different from the 2003 one I reviewed in #3, which was a tiny bit harsh the last third, which proves that with some age on, these little monsters turn into elegant gentlemen. - Submitted by Estrella on July 29, 2004
This cigar spans 3 pages: 1 [2] 3
| | » Add a new review for Diplomaticos Diplomaticos No. 5
Due to abuse of our review system by a small minority of internet users, we have decided to require reviewers to signup to our site before they may post a review. Signup is free, and all we require is a valid e-mail address. Please note we will not pass your e-mail on to any third party.
(Click here to Register or Login)
| | |
|